After this week's readings, I learned a lot about e-Learning and I will try to make connections as much as possible with my teaching experience. The chapters present us the necessary skills, effective strategies and examples of technologies that will foster and develop communication and collaboration skills and also e-Learning guidelines and activities. These activities can have as audience all the subjects involved in the learning process such as students, instructor(s), parents and college administrators. Technology, then, can serve a variety of purposes, since facilitating and being a catalyst element for learning until enabling principals to easily contact parents to talk about their kids performance in class or issues they might have. Along with that, technology can also be used for the three basic forms of communication: point-to-point, one-to-many and many-to-many. Thus, there are tons of possible situations wherein technology can be used.
I have taught this semester a unit on communication and collaboration and students collected many tools that can be used. For instance, they used skype, Edmodo, Google Docs, Socrative, Poll Anywhere, Twitter, Google Hangouts, Remind and many others. However, careful planning is necessary so that Communication and Collaboration tools can be effectively used and have a real, concrete impact on students' learning. I personally believe five aspects are essential when planning those activities: purpose, content, time, participant's roles and forms of interaction.
I think these five components make up a good basis of what
effective communication with technology would be.
Examples of benefits from the use of technology-supported communication are: it gives the
students the flexibility to work on their assigned roles and assignments
even in the comfort of the homes; communication through emails, Google docs, and social media can definitely help students bring
together information more easily; classroom blogs or webpages with daily or weekly posts help students and their parents keep track of that is going on in the classroom; Google Drive helps save paper in communities with limited budget by sharing assignments, feedback and grades with students and parents, and many other situations. Using technology, the
students can freely express and communicate their ideas without the
barriers of the classroom. Communication technologies, therefore, have definitely opened a new perspective on learning regardless of grade levels, subject areas or topic.
As for e-Learning technologies, I have myself experienced for the first time a fully online class as a student. I would say, first of all, that technologies such as Learning Management Systems and Communication Technologies are essential for e-learning courses, even more than to f2f instruction. They not only help students keep track of their assignments, grades and deadlines, but also enable interactions between teacher-student, student-student or between groups of people. I also believe careful planning is even more important because there is an extra psychological and practical factor involved in e-Learning. Students enrolled in online classes already envision the "burden" of being away from a physical learning environment, which puts more pressure on him/her. From a more practical perspective, students have to be more independent, autonomous and disciplined. In most online classes we don't usually see a closer connection to students due to their diverse characteristics, to the lack of human contact before, during and after classes and because human beings don~t usually feel encouraged to interact with unknown people.
To sum it up, I cannot judge yet whether e-Learning is better than f2f instruction since I have only seen the perspective from a student. In a near future I might have some experience with online courses as a teaching assistant and then I will feel more confident to express my opinion based on both experiences.
Lucas,
ReplyDeleteI love your thoughts about communication. I have incorporated blog responses, social media, and backchanneling into some of my lessons throughout the year and I value it for several reasons. First, we all know it can be uncomfortable to speak in a large class. Sometimes the teacher only calls on a few people, or perhaps the people speaking say the ideas you were thinking. Allowing students to write their thoughts during a lesson using a backchannel (like Twitter, or TodaysMeet) lets students speak up who might not want to speak up during class. I've learned that sometimes the quietest students often have the most to say. Responding to blogs also taps into this skill as well. I don't think a classroom can be all digital, though. There is value in learning to speak face-to-face with peers, overcoming those uncomfortable situations in large classes and speaking. Learning how to do that through digital and social media is a great place to start though!
I agree with your thoughts about e-learning. Before experiencing this UGA program, I really did not appreciate the other factors involved in e-learning when compared to traditional programs. Planning is definitely more extensive since assignments can be due throughout the week instead on a particular day. Interacting with people you do not know online also still feels awkward at times. However, it's definitely been a great experience. As a teacher, I would prefer f2f or a hybrid model. I like being able to see students' faces and their reactions to my teaching. As a student, I also prefer f2f, but there is no way I could otherwise pursue this degree without having a e-learning.
ReplyDeleteLucas,
ReplyDeleteI really appreciate your thoughts on how technology can be used to enhance or help communication. I also like how you have emphasized with your students the importance that the communication technology has to help or improve. I so often see teachers trying to use modes of communication that do not help the students, or they use the tool the wrong way. For example, Remind 101 can be a great app to get quick messages to students or update students on a sudden change, but I have heard students comment on how much they hate the service. When asked further they say it is because teachers are "blowing up" their phones. Many will not even sign up for the service if you suggest it to the class. I think this is points to what you said about using the communication that works best for the teacher and the student.